National Geographic's Collectors Corner

Collaborative site for collectors, dealers, & anyone interested in our history.

Here's a question for all of you who've dreamt of collecting a full matched set. The bindings on some of my volumes from around the turn of the (last) century are splitting and are rather a mish-mash of styles -some old leather, some buckram and a couple are more modern ex-libris library re-bindings. Is there any consensus amongst you collectors as binding issues? That is, is there a premium for "original" bindings (as in "dating to near the time of printing" as NG never released anything but the '64 reprints as bound volumes) ? Does the premium for matched bindings trump this?

-Kevin

Views: 72

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

You're not exactly correct on the Society selling bound years. Look at about any issue from 1906-1916, and there will be an offer to sell 1 to ten years back issues in a brown binding. Essentially, these were a way to deplete remainders. After the First World War, they were still available after 1897, but were not advertised. I believe because there was no other bindery mark on the few copies I have seen, they were bound either in-house (Society did do its own binding for its executives' and government comp sets) or by Judd Detweiler who printed these years.

As a collector, I'd assume the Society bound ought to be maintained unless complete shot. Any other binding except for Albrecht airplane-and-globe probably never added to value, and if deteriorating (especially as badly as you indicate) would drastically diminish set's value. Whether rebinding is economically justified is purely speculative. If you want to rebind a deteriorating non-uniform set for personal aesthetic, I would think it would enhance value. Question, however, is would it increase value in excess of cost of rebinding.

I will offer one anecdote. A widow and sun decided to rebind a horrendously faded/sun-cooked set of mostly Albrecht with some early years ex libris buckram. They spent about $6000 to put into very serviceable 3/4 leather in about 1988.
When I helped broker the 1903-1988 set's transfer it got $10,000 plus shipping and insurance. I highly question whether the old man's set was worth less than $4000, so they either made nothing or lost money (certainly time value) by the rebinding, which I advised against.

That having been said, I do not doubt that continuous runs in uniform binding is more valuable than mismatched bindings. If you have fifteen or twenty cover varieties (as with the Buxbaum remnants I liquidated ten years ago), I would say as a set they are worth holf or less what the same text blocks in a uniform binding would fetch.

Happy collecting
Paul Crist
Houston

RSS

Members

Legal notice about this site

Note: Any sales or trade arrangements are solely between users of this site; The National Geographic Society is not a party to and does not endorse or promote any particular sales or trade arrangements between collectors, dealers, or others. Due to the immediate nature of this medium, National Geographic Online also does not review, censor, approve, edit or endorse information placed on this forum. Discussion boards on National Geographic Online are intended to be appropriate for family members of all ages. Posting of indecent material is strictly prohibited. The placement of advertisements or solicitations unrelated to National Geographic also is prohibited. National Geographic Online shall review information placed on this forum from time to time and delete inappropriate material that comes to its attention as soon as it is practicable, but cannot guarantee that such material will not be found on the forum. By posting material on this discussion board you agree to adhere to this policy prohibiting indecent, offensive or extraneous advertising material, and to legally assume full and sole responsibility for your posting.

© 2024   Created by Cathy Hunter.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service