Hi folks! While many (if not all) of us on this forum maintain our own private inventory systems in addition to the books published by Nathan and Buxbaum -- I am curious whether a collaborative catalogue exists among this community. I cannot imagine that I am the first to ask this question, but my searches so far have found no examples.
In particular, while I am delighted by the readily shared information on this forum, including examples in the past month by Larry Moffett and Scott Shier with photos and descriptions -- the forum can become a difficult format to quickly search and reference this information.
My thought here is -- separate from tracking one's personal collection -- a repository for cataloguing information about Nat Geo items that can outlive all of us, in a standard, portable format that is also not locked into a single company or technology.
The goal is not to replace the forum -- my hope is that it would enhance and complement the discussions that happen here on the forum.
The key advantages that I see to this include:
The key concerns I see, and have plans to address, include:
To be clear, I am not asking someone to create this for me. If something like this does not exist already, I plan to take the initiative to create the system and begin populating it with information available to me. However, before investing significant time in the concept, I want to check whether an effort like this is already underway.
If something like this already exists, I would prefer to contribute to that effort instead!
For any who would want to discuss specific ideas for how to implement this, I would be happy to discuss in a separate post -- but in this thread, I'd rather keep this one on the question at hand ("has this already been done?").
Thank you for your time and wisdom!
Richard Kennedy
Hi Daniel,
I use Bookpedia and DVDpedia to catalog my collection. I currently have over 3,500 publications cataloged along with 1,100 videos. It can hold a great deal of data about each item along with a photograph. I have attached a screen capture giving an example of this. It also allows export to HTML and I have room on my personal website to host these.
Apr 2
Dale
Hi Daniel
I understand that you have expertise in how such an online catalog might best be structured and don't wish to undermine that, but out of curiousity I asked Chat-GPT, hoping this might help:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zAQKuSroMqLjg5RQLxK5nqwadr7Wzw9...
Cheers
Dale
Apr 3
Daniel Eckert
Currently I'm leaning toward SMW but will be tinkering with it a bit more today before bring it back to the Corner. Omeka S seems like an excellent choice for enforcing rigid adherence to structured data, but is very inflexible from a community perspective. In Omeka S, there is an expectation for a "librarian" to establish each resource template and regular users have to stay strictly within it. The templates are somewhat time consuming to plan, and although the result is very well structured data, I am concerned that the level of effort necessary to understand the system exceeds what would be sustainable in a community/hobbyist setting.
By comparison, SMW seems to provides more flexibility and ease of use for casual edits, as well as more flexibility in how to add new resource types -- but that also means tradeoffs in community practice (i.e. how we think about and use the tools).
More to come.
Apr 3