Supplement for January 2011 ? (Phil, Scott, Mel, Tom, ...anyone?) - National Geographic's Collectors Corner2024-03-28T16:44:34Zhttp://ngscollectors.ning.com/forum/topics/supplement-for-january-2011-phil-scott-mel-tom-anyone?feed=yes&xn_auth=noHi Mel,
Yes I think I…tag:ngscollectors.ning.com,2015-02-17:1029239:Comment:1020242015-02-17T23:00:06.718ZLloyd Bonaccorsohttp://ngscollectors.ning.com/profile/LloydBonaccorso
<p>Hi Mel,</p>
<p></p>
<p> Yes I think I received my Jan. 2011 with the mag also. But did not get my Mar. 2011.</p>
<p>See my reply to Phil near the beginning of the discussion.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Hi Mel,</p>
<p></p>
<p> Yes I think I received my Jan. 2011 with the mag also. But did not get my Mar. 2011.</p>
<p>See my reply to Phil near the beginning of the discussion.</p>
<p>Thanks</p> Hi Phil,
Yes, I belie…tag:ngscollectors.ning.com,2015-02-17:1029239:Comment:1019482015-02-17T22:57:20.491ZLloyd Bonaccorsohttp://ngscollectors.ning.com/profile/LloydBonaccorso
<p>Hi Phil,</p>
<p></p>
<p> Yes, I believe it was in with my mag subscription (as Mel said his was), I started my sub in 2007 so it had to have come with my Jan. 2011 issue, because I do not remember buying it separately from anyone.</p>
<p>I don't buy any retail issues so I wouldn't have received it from there.</p>
<p>Perhaps this is why my Mar 2011 sup. didn't come with my mag, maybe it was one of those that you say were not sent to "all" subscribers.</p>
<p>Though I did see Tom mention…</p>
<p>Hi Phil,</p>
<p></p>
<p> Yes, I believe it was in with my mag subscription (as Mel said his was), I started my sub in 2007 so it had to have come with my Jan. 2011 issue, because I do not remember buying it separately from anyone.</p>
<p>I don't buy any retail issues so I wouldn't have received it from there.</p>
<p>Perhaps this is why my Mar 2011 sup. didn't come with my mag, maybe it was one of those that you say were not sent to "all" subscribers.</p>
<p>Though I did see Tom mention that he believed all subscribers should have received it with their magazine.</p>
<p>Well, when I get around to it, I will have to see what NGM says about getting me that supplement.</p> I don't know how I missed thi…tag:ngscollectors.ning.com,2015-02-17:1029239:Comment:1020212015-02-17T18:54:06.079ZGeorge Thomas Wilsonhttp://ngscollectors.ning.com/profile/GeorgeThomasWilson
<p>I don't know how I missed this one, Mel. I guess it slipped though the gap between my passive collecting (a big box of maps in the attic) and my active collecting (eBay, dealers, and such) which started around then.</p>
<p>Oh well, it gives me something else to search for.</p>
<p>Tom</p>
<p>I don't know how I missed this one, Mel. I guess it slipped though the gap between my passive collecting (a big box of maps in the attic) and my active collecting (eBay, dealers, and such) which started around then.</p>
<p>Oh well, it gives me something else to search for.</p>
<p>Tom</p> Scott,
Yes. We should have a…tag:ngscollectors.ning.com,2015-02-17:1029239:Comment:1018222015-02-17T04:48:03.618ZPhilip Rivierehttp://ngscollectors.ning.com/profile/PhilipRiviere
<p>Scott,</p>
<p>Yes. We should have a separate list of "Odd Supplements"( anything that is stuffed in the magazine sent to subscribers) that none of our group can ever agree on as supplements. This should be separate from the traditional list of maps and perforated and non perforated, attached and unattached supplements...</p>
<p>Phil</p>
<p>Scott,</p>
<p>Yes. We should have a separate list of "Odd Supplements"( anything that is stuffed in the magazine sent to subscribers) that none of our group can ever agree on as supplements. This should be separate from the traditional list of maps and perforated and non perforated, attached and unattached supplements...</p>
<p>Phil</p>
attached ref.tag:ngscollectors.ning.com,2015-02-17:1029239:Comment:1018202015-02-17T03:48:42.687ZScott T. Shierhttp://ngscollectors.ning.com/profile/ScottTShier
<p></p>
<p>attached ref.</p>
<p></p>
<p>attached ref.</p> Phil, and everyone:
Should…tag:ngscollectors.ning.com,2015-02-17:1029239:Comment:1019452015-02-17T03:46:16.129ZScott T. Shierhttp://ngscollectors.ning.com/profile/ScottTShier
<p></p>
<p>Phil, and everyone:</p>
<p></p>
<p>Should we add a separate album of all the misc. odd supplements/inserts/tear-outs/posters, etc. that are not maps as already presented in all of Phil's map image albums? </p>
<p></p>
<p>Phil, and everyone:</p>
<p></p>
<p>Should we add a separate album of all the misc. odd supplements/inserts/tear-outs/posters, etc. that are not maps as already presented in all of Phil's map image albums? </p> Lloyd,
FYI - I list both item…tag:ngscollectors.ning.com,2015-02-17:1029239:Comment:1019422015-02-17T03:14:17.567ZMelvin L. De Vilbisshttp://ngscollectors.ning.com/profile/MelvinLDeVilbiss
<p>Lloyd,</p>
<p>FYI - I list both items you mentioned as supplements, and both were received in my regular subscription.</p>
<p>Mel</p>
<p>Lloyd,</p>
<p>FYI - I list both items you mentioned as supplements, and both were received in my regular subscription.</p>
<p>Mel</p> . . . a gaggle of non-standa…tag:ngscollectors.ning.com,2015-02-17:1029239:Comment:1016122015-02-17T03:05:53.095ZScott T. Shierhttp://ngscollectors.ning.com/profile/ScottTShier
<p style="text-align: center;"></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>. . . a gaggle of non-standard NGM insert/sup/map/Other items ~ Attached image</strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>. . . a gaggle of non-standard NGM insert/sup/map/Other items ~ Attached image</strong></span></p> Lloyd,
Yes, I remember the J…tag:ngscollectors.ning.com,2015-02-17:1029239:Comment:1017742015-02-17T03:00:57.222ZScott T. Shierhttp://ngscollectors.ning.com/profile/ScottTShier
<p>Lloyd,</p>
<p></p>
<p>Yes, I remember the Jan 2011 Biodiversity "supplement" , which struck me as more akin to being a content "Insert" addendum rather than a traditional 'supplement'. BUT, they did print the word "supp...." on it, so.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Lloyd, you raise in-part, an issue that some Corner members here have skated around w/ comments here or there but I'm not sure of a specific, thorough thread where we've delineated these . . . may I say odd-balls to the supplement…</p>
<p>Lloyd,</p>
<p></p>
<p>Yes, I remember the Jan 2011 Biodiversity "supplement" , which struck me as more akin to being a content "Insert" addendum rather than a traditional 'supplement'. BUT, they did print the word "supp...." on it, so.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Lloyd, you raise in-part, an issue that some Corner members here have skated around w/ comments here or there but I'm not sure of a specific, thorough thread where we've delineated these . . . may I say odd-balls to the supplement inventories.</p>
<p></p>
<p>In a way, anything/everything removable --or made to be removed-- is a supplement, but classically most people connote supplement to loose NGM maps.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Not long ago, a few of us you ID'd in your post title were mulling over these exceptions to the rule, and there are a bunch, but never moreso than this past couple years. They've been tossing long-held conventions or patterns out the window as it were, and I like to pretend they are doing it with us collector's in mind (ha!).</p>
<p></p>
<p>Supplements can be any of the following:</p>
<p>maps;</p>
<p>pictorials -- w/ this I really mean the vintage art pictorials from circa 1903-1921; 1933; 1957 ;</p>
<p>3D glasses;</p>
<p>Smell Survey;</p>
<p>(perforated) "Posters" {e.g, mostly a newer thing, but there are a few from farther back --> 2004, 2000 ;</p>
<p>some other perforated "content" not billed as map or poster --> 1983, 1979, 1977 ;</p>
<p>a few non-perforated items like 1916's General Sherman Tree; and a Cargill/<em>Firsts</em> poster in Jan. 2015, and a -<em>something</em> from the late 70's that I kept forgetting to itemize and post in here;</p>
<p>loose leaflet/pamphlets like your Biodiversity above;</p>
<p>that crowd-pleasing 125th Anniv. "Covers" poster <em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">only in newsstand copies: Aug, Oct, Dec 2013</span></em> <span style="text-decoration: underline;">!</span> ;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">and</span> also ---></p>
<ul>
<li>"Green Guide" supplement/pamphlet insert - May 2009, 2 pg. pamphlet/leaflet;</li>
<li>"Solutions for a better world" - April 2009, 18 pg. booklet/pamphlet;</li>
<li>a Dow Chem. Co. "H2O" folded map/info. thing that was gummy-glue attached to it's June 2007 issue;</li>
<li>a June 2002 Ford/Mt. Everest folded map thing [not an official supplement - sponsored content and not billed] ;</li>
<li>August 2007 had a "Eureeka - Photo Journal Extra" leaflet, w/ a thin cardboarded Eurkeeka cd" insert</li>
</ul>
<p></p>
<p>Am I forgetting something else, everyone?</p>
<p></p>
<p>It's all good fun eh Lloyd!? I can provide some pics or scans if there's anything I mentioned that folks forgot about.</p>
<p></p>
<p>As for your March 2011 '7 Billion' map supplement, you <strong>should</strong> have received that w/ your March '11 issue, as everyone else did. Though, it's always possible that by mistake some came off the press lines and got mail-bagged/sealed without a supp. Wonder how common that would be in the 2000's?</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>I'd be curious to see if they would respond to your call now and make any effort to send you out a replacement map only -- 4 years later. NGM's mailing/subscriber services are handled by a 3rd party in Florida, and the usual rule of thumb is you can only report missing/damaged issues for a rolling 3 months, and request either a replacement or an extension of your expiration term by one month. ***When asking for a replacement, it takes them about 2 months or more to finally send one, and usually I have experienced that it is either a UK printed copy, or one that exhibits moderate wear-n-tear for whatever reasons....</p>
<p></p>
<p> ~ Scott</p> Lloyd,
There was a biodiversi…tag:ngscollectors.ning.com,2015-02-16:1029239:Comment:1015112015-02-16T23:14:41.480ZPhilip Rivierehttp://ngscollectors.ning.com/profile/PhilipRiviere
<p>Lloyd,</p>
<p>There was a biodiversity issue and a supplement in Feb. 1999</p>
<p>Phil</p>
<p>Lloyd,</p>
<p>There was a biodiversity issue and a supplement in Feb. 1999</p>
<p>Phil</p>