National Geographic's Collectors Corner

Collaborative site for collectors, dealers, & anyone interested in our history.

Red anomaly in our 1986 - Soviets in Space October issue

Our October 1986 issue (cover is Soviets in Space) has an interesting anomaly that I didn’t realize was out of the ordinary at the time. Until now, I just assumed that both me and my brother had the map/supplement missing from this issue, due to the red highlight on the spine. But I was told that actually there is no map or supplement for this issue. Both our copies are from Australia.

Not sure why copies in Australia would have the red highlight.

Does anyone in America have a copy of this issue handy to see if they have a red highlight on the spine? Anyone from Australia or a different country?

Views: 46

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

This is interesting, Pece. 

My copy, from America, has no red on the spine. "SOVIETS IN SPACE" is in black as is the rest of the spine verbiage.

Here's what mine looks like:

And this is yours:

Pece,

There was no red highlight on the spine and no supplement for the October 1986 U.S. issue....

Phil

Pece,

Ditto with Tom and Phil's comments. My copy is all black on the binding.

To add to this, sometimes the NGS published regionally different issues (though usually only the advertisements were affected).

In 1986, I was living in Tacoma, Washington and not on the U.S. east coast as I presume Tom and Phil were at time.

This would indicate homogeneity within the United States.

Nice observation on your part - thanks for sharing!

Mel

Credit goes to Scott for initially telling me that his version of the issue was in black.

Thank you everyone for sharing. If I encounter anymore of these issues in the future, I will write here to indicate if it is consistent with the red highlight.

. . . On further thought, now your red text makes me wish that there had been a supplement for this issue/topic. A map of Star City and an image on reverse of say, their space shuttle Buran, would have been cool.

I went through my issue again after this post, Scott.  I was hoping to find some perforations.

Do you think it was red for Communism as it the "red scare"?  Make it more menacing?

Or, just maybe, it just was to highlight the cover article.  Perfectly innocent.

Ha ~ clever pun Tom !

...good thought about double-checking for a perforated "section". 

Given the time period, it cannot have been to accentuate the lead story. They only have done that recently, for single-topic issues.

RSS

Members

Legal notice about this site

Note: Any sales or trade arrangements are solely between users of this site; The National Geographic Society is not a party to and does not endorse or promote any particular sales or trade arrangements between collectors, dealers, or others. Due to the immediate nature of this medium, National Geographic Online also does not review, censor, approve, edit or endorse information placed on this forum. Discussion boards on National Geographic Online are intended to be appropriate for family members of all ages. Posting of indecent material is strictly prohibited. The placement of advertisements or solicitations unrelated to National Geographic also is prohibited. National Geographic Online shall review information placed on this forum from time to time and delete inappropriate material that comes to its attention as soon as it is practicable, but cannot guarantee that such material will not be found on the forum. By posting material on this discussion board you agree to adhere to this policy prohibiting indecent, offensive or extraneous advertising material, and to legally assume full and sole responsibility for your posting.

© 2017   Created by Cathy Hunter.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service